Extra Flamin' Hot Cheetos

targeted killing of war and international law of armed conflict.

MORE TARGETED KILLINGS 'EASY WITH THE RESTORATION OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF MILITARY WAR OR THE CREATION OF AD HOC UN CODICE PER LE MISSIONI.

Di Valerio Mattioli

Secondo autorevoli dottrine militari rese note da generali e che io, negli anni scorsi ho letto assiduamente, la cosa più sconcertante del tempo di guerra è che l’omicidio non solo non è perseguibile, in determinati casi, ma diventa persino un obbligo giuridico . La cosa di per sé è abbastanza agghiacciante, se si considera che il codice penale di guerra in realtà non fa dell’omicidio un obbligo giuridico, ma ne esclude la sua punibilità se avvenuto in determinate circostanze. Inoltre va aggiunto che il militare può essere dotato di consegne che giuridicamente are different from the orders and that, as the Court of Military courts are not subject to interpretation by the person who must carry out to the letter, as they are enunciated.

E 'then in the folds of these deliveries, legal protection from the military penal code of war that took shape under a legal obligation to kill without incurring any penalty. Indeed, in some cases, violations of these deliveries, which we refer to the misnomer of "rules of engagement", which create an obligation to kill, are punished very severely, as we will see shortly. During the fight every soldier has an assigned seat and, if you leave, pursuant to art. 119 cpmg, is punished with life imprisonment, and until 1994, only fifteen years ago with the death penalty. Similarly, the military violates his surrender or abandon his post in front of the enemy and compromise is always punished with life imprisonment, which replaces the death penalty, effective until fifteen years ago, pursuant to art. 124 cpmg. If the first

Corporal Alessandro Di Lisio, died on 14 July, following an explosion that had hit his armored vehicle and on which he was, in the turret, the so-called "fifth wheel" without any known armor, he also left his post at the moment for smoke a cigarette, would receive a sentence of up to ten years in military prison if he had applied Article. 124 of the Military Penal Code of war. In this case, it applies only to the military penal code of peace, imprisonment up to three years.

An examination of the cases just stated just close, omitting all the others that, for lack of space, however, would not allow an exhaustive, it is quite clear that it is impossible for the military to abandon its place in front the enemy, under penalty of life imprisonment, time, or the death penalty up to fifteen years ago, translates into a legal obligation to combat that by its very nature, comporta l’uccisione dell’avversario. Anzi, nella stragrande maggioranza dei casi, l’unico modo per sottrarsi al combattimento senza incorrere nella violazione di quelle fattispecie di reato che abbiamo appena esaminato, è quello di uccidere tutti gli avversari, o farli prigionieri, se si arrendono, sì da porre fine al medesimo conflitto armato.

A ben vedere, quindi, l’applicazione del codice penale militare di guerra permette delle soluzioni tecniche più radicali, che escludono la loro punibilità. Nasce, quindi, il sospetto che il se tentativo di reintrodurlo nasce certamente da una maggiore tutela del personale militare, che così può fare un uso più esteso delle armi, la copertura di alcune fattispecie, con la sanzione del carcere a vita, fa supporre la creazione di norme ad hoc inserite in consegne speciali, al quale il soldato non può sottrarvisi, come, ad esempio, gli omicidi mirati, la cui esistenza, per ora, può solo essere solo presunta ed ipotizzata. La logica che è sottesa a questa scelta è di una drammatica lucidità: perché uccidere un numero indeterminato di persone innocenti, sperando di colpire il bersaglio giusto, quando è possibile ottenere lo stesso risultato dichiarando una singola persona "obiettivo militare"?

Secondo il premio Pulitzer Bob Woodward la drastica diminuzione della violenza in Iraq sarebbe dovuta ad un programma segreto di omicidi targeted to identify the human target and eliminate (Time, 10/9/2008, p. 17).. Superwitness, in his article in the Corriere della Sera on July 27, 2009, p.. 2, announced that the judges are trying to determine whether the activities of our soldiers come under the mandate given to our military and comply with the rules established at the time of funding the mission . On 25 June 2009 on "Il Giornale" Fausto Biloslavo denounced the removal of individuals by Italian special forces through the eloquent title "The paratroopers on a mission to kill. It 's the first time for the Italians. " On June 26, 2009, the day after, Gianfranco Paglia, a paratrooper officer, a gold medal for military valor, whose credibility is not allowed to doubt, to criticize the article Biloslavo, in a letter not only contradicted by these operating modes described the day before, but added, visibly angrily that "this could jeopardize the lives of all who are there. There are things that deserve a state secret and not because you are afraid to say or because they want to hide something, simply because there is the danger of retaliation " (Time, 26/6/2009, p.. 27) . the day of the appearance of the critic wrote Straw, the Ministry of Defence made to disappear from its website an article by Biloslavo that previously had been placed on the June 25, 2009 . Eloquent, no?

According to a circular issued by the Defense, all those journalists who found themselves temporarily to serve as officers in the area of \u200b\u200boperations when they return to their newsrooms, on leave, will continue to ask permission for anything: article theses, conference, written correspondence, etc.. who has an unspecified "military interest" (L'Espresso, 09.03.2009, p. 20)..

born suspect the dirty work that are likely to emerge in this article, has already begun.

In case of publication, it is necessary to quote the source, after asking permission.