Date le numerose critiche ricevute a seguito dell’articolo precedente, ho ritenuto necessary to clarify some points, so my words are not misunderstood.
I state that I am a fan of Beppe Grillo and I recognize the value of his work and raising a complaint. I am convinced that making their voices heard will always be a step towards a better future and that all revolutions from the bottom. That said, the problem is that often the voice is voice, awareness of the need for change is pure ideology. As stated above, "is something" but not enough.
I will give the conservative-reactionary because they are not. In contrast, when I argued that the "new" meant to be born from the need for reform, that is the concretization of the ideas from the legislative revolutionary fire of the square. In my opinion if the people stop it gets a little invective. The wind of change must go through a new shared culture in political-party, so that parliament could lead to new legislation to modernize the country, affecting the social fabric, cultural and entrepreneurial. The revolution for institutional path, a bit 'like Zapatero in Spain! However, aware of the Italian reality, I argued that this support and realization of the right words in the square is difficult to realize. From there, the metaphor of the windmills.
As a student of political science, a 'realistic analysis is still going fatta.Poi a manifestare e sfogare il proprio malcontento, alla democrazia certo male non farà .
0 comments:
Post a Comment